"Welcome to our company blog. Within these blog posts, we hope to share our insights on clinical quality management, the patient-centered medical home, chronic disease management in primary care, evidence-based medicine, and the use of technology in ambulatory care settings."

- David Morin, CEO and Donald Nease Jr., MD, Chief Medical Officer

We're proud of Cielo Clinic's inclusion in the AHRQ Innovations Database. The database documents the success of ClinfoTracker (the former name of Cielo Clinic) in simultaneously increasing quality on a variety of measures. It's a great testament to the power of the product. See: http://www.innovations.ahrq.gov/content.aspx?id=1771 Dave Morin CEO Cielo MedSolutions

Data is data, right? Facts and figures presented in some manner. More data is always better than less? Larger reports must always tell you more? Many a job has been justified on generating data. There are many to which generating data is the end-goal. Each of us is drowning in data. And much of it really doesn't help you do what you do better. Shouldn't that be the point of getting data? Actionable data is data that you can do something with. It answers not just "what" but "why". An example: your clinical system generates a report that says your compliance rate with a guideline for measuring A1C levels every six months for diabetics is 50%. That tells you, for half your diabetic patients, you are meeting the goals of the guideline. Cool! Now, you want to get that compliance rate to 60%. What do you do? All the report tells you is that 50% are in compliance. You have no idea what's going on with the other 50%, you don't even know who they are. Good luck getting your compliance rate higher. Here comes the need for actionable data! The data you need to get your compliance rate higher includes: 1. A list of the patients not in compliance. Yep, this certainly is where you'd start, but this alone doesn't tell you why they are not in compliance. And, it needs to be all the patients not in compliance, even those you haven't seen in years. 2. Details as to why they are not complaint (like: have never been seen, have a lab req but never completed it, refused to do it, have not been asked to do it). Cool. Now we know what to do for each patient. How do we take action to move forward? 3. Contact information for each of these patients. Use this info for telephone calls, custom letters, emails, text messages, smoke signals, whatever it takes to reach these non-compliant patients and move them to compliance (Note: Cielo Clinic can generate letters and create call lists but cannot yet generate smoke signals). And, because you know the exact reason each patient is not in compliance, you can have directed communication with them to get to their exact needs. 4. Details on the actions you take. Track the fact you made calls, sent letters, got more lab reqs out, etc… So, as you continue to work with these patients, you know exactly what you've done to be smarter about it next time around. Got actionable data? Dave Morin CEO Cielo MedSolutions

As you know if you've spoken with us or spent much time browsing our website, we're big on the fact that Cielo Clinic contains a coded, all-problem registry. Here's a brief description of why that is so important. Your registry is only as good as its accuracy. Many registries are built off of billing data. Not a bad place to start you may say. Just take all those people with asthma or depression codes and dump 'em in! Not so fast... Billing data sits at one end of a long process that begins with a clinician thinking, "This patient is wheezing, but I don't have enough yet to make an asthma diagnosis." So the clinician either writes down "wheezing" which gets changed to a billable diagnosis of asthma, or they realize from the start that wheezing won't get paid for and they just write asthma. When that billing data gets dumped into the registry, the patient with wheezing is now part of the asthma registry, and becomes part of the reporting for which one is responsible. Whoops! If you have a system that allows you to accurately represent with a coded problem what that clinician is thinking, "wheezing" doesn't become "asthma", and your quality improvement efforts are focused with precision on the patients that truly have asthma. Cielo Clinic contains a rich set of clinical terminology that was built by having primary care physicians record problems using words that make sense to them. These terms are coded, and mapped to a classification system that allows accurate aggregation of the problems into disease categories for quality management. If your quality management system can't do this, you'll spin your wheels focusing on patients that don't have the diseases you're trying to impact. If you build it they will come - Field of Dreams OK, maybe it's a bit corny, but that's our reason for having an "all-problem" registry. Clinicians build it by recording the problems they are working with every day. Not just on a select set of patients, but all patients. A lot of work? Not if you are getting something in return. What Cielo Clinic gives you in return is an accurate problem list on every patient, using terms you understand, not up-coded to meet billing standards. Additionally, Cielo Clinic gives you back reminders based on those problems and the ability to "on-the-fly" respond when new guidelines emerge for conditions. Because you've been accurately recording the problems, you have already built the registry for any given clinical disease category. You're building it, because those new guidelines will come! Don Nease, MD Chief Medical Officer Cielo MedSolutions

Every time an account manager at Cielo makes a presentation on Cielo Clinic, they highlight the fact that a provider can access our software either through a paper or web-based Encounter Form. For those not familiar with our product, the Encounter Form is the interface a physician uses to know what services, screening and counseling are due for a patient at the time of their visit. This Form can be delivered either via a web interface from a device connected to a network or can be delivered by a printed piece of paper. The web-based Encounter Form was designed to be extremely simple, easy to use and requires just a few clicks of a mouse by a provider. The next item our account managers highlight is that 100% of the providers utilizing Cielo Clinic access it via the the paper form and not the web interface. This includes environments that have laptops and wireless networks in exam rooms and can easily make use of the web interface. It also includes providers of all ages, even the "young ones". No one dismisses the value of the web interface, they just think that the paper form works best for their workflow. In most cases, the people at the presentation strike a curious look at that statistic and are either 1) shocked and challenge it, 2) insistent that this will not happen at their practice(s) or 3) humored by it and make some sort of dumb joke. This predisposition to use of paper in the exam room is not something that should be challenged and dismissed but instead something that should be studied. I am a big believer that the value technology can deliver is often confused by people who see it as an end result versus a means of achieving an end result. Our software is not a product that lets a physician use a laptop in an exam room, it is a solution for providing better quality of care to patients. The technology facilitates the ability to deliver this increased quality of care, but, in the end, it is the provider delivering the care, not the technology. Many people jump too quickly to the conclusion that, if only the provider used the technology "correctly" (read: uses a laptop to access everything), they would be much more effiicient and productive. What we need to learn more about is why providers feel the paper Encounter Form works best for their workflow. Does the use of a laptop or other device take away from physician-patient interaction? Is juggling a laptop in an exam room just too much effort when a simple piece of paper will suffice? Is there an emotional connection to a piece of paper that is just hard wired into humans? Is reading off a screen too difficult? There's lots of questions that can be asked, but I think we will find it all boils down to a few fundamental issues. We're studying it further and have begun to collect responses. I'll be sure to share what we find. Dave Morin CEO Cielo MedSolutions